Dailies
- Beast or Buddha
- Caoine
- Echoica
- GNUCITIZEN
- Jina Bolton
- Lifehacker
- Overclockers Australia
- RiskAnalys.is
- Rory.Blog
- Schneier on Security
- Security Bloggers Network
- Security Catalyst Community
- Security Ripcord
- Securosis.com
- Slashdot
- Whirlpool
Photos
Categories
- Books
- Computers
- Family
- Forensics
- General
- GTD
- Movies
- Music
- Privacy
- Profession
- Risk
- Security
- University and Studies
- Web Development
Monthly archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- December 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- February 2005
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
Search
Deadly Umbrella
I read about these sorts of situations from Schneier all the time, where bouts of paranoia and the lack of common sense run rampant around security issues. One of his latest articles that springs to mind is his commentary on the risk of mobile phones on airplanes, where a remote chance of useful technology being used for bad purposes has to be strictly controlled, often employing outrageous techniques.
I’d also presume that in my line of work these sorts of issues would pop up daily but in fact they don’t. Not to say that it doesn’t occur, just not all the time, or as frequently as I would guess - but at the same time I’m not sure that I can compare the environments.
It was with much dismay that one of these experiences happened to me first hand (or second hand as Sara was the poor dear who had to put up with airport security incompetence). And today we’re talking about Umbrellas. Yep - those deadly weapons used by ninja-like assassins all over the earth to dis-embowel and de-head people.
All we were doing was seeing off my eldest sibling (plus hubby + soon-to-be-born baby) from the domestic airport and the next thing I know Sara’s Umbrella is being denied entrance into the departure lounge. On top of this they did not offer a single suggestion for what she should do with the item, including offerering to hold it for her. In fact, they advised her that it was her problem and they didn’t really care what she did with the Umbrella, as long as it didn’t enter the departure lounge. In short, they hinted that she should go put it back in her car - but naturally the reason for having the Umbrella in the first place was because of all the god-damned rain. So what was she meant to do? Run out through the rain, place her Umbrella in the car and run back through the downpour? Hell no - instead she did something that I’m sure in itself may have been a security breach, and that was to hide the Umbrella under a display table.
As far as my brief research could tell - there is only a single mention of Umbrellas in regards to aviation security. Furthermore they advise that Umbrellas are “allowed in carry-on baggage once they have been inspected to ensure that prohibited items are not concealed“. When looking for mentions of when these weapons of mass destruction should be allowed on local flights I found Nothing. That’s right Absolutely Nothing. So what were these security officers thinking?
Probably not much of anything - or if anything at all it was probably more along the lines of - “inspect this umbrella? can’t be bothered.” So did they make the environment safer? I would say no. Especially as the item in question was hidden under a table for some other would-be murderer-slash-psychopath to pick up and cause some serious damage with.
So what to do next time? Ponchos. Ponchos people ponchos.
Posted by Christian
19 June 2005
Post A Comment