un-excogitate.org
Dailies
- Beast or Buddha
- Caoine
- Echoica
- Jina Bolton
- Lifehacker
- Overclockers Australia
- RiskAnalys.is
- Rory.Blog
- Schneier on Security
- Security Catalyst Community
- Security Ripcord
- Securosis.com
- Slashdot
- Whirlpool
Photos
Categories
- Books
- Computers
- Family
- Forensics
- General
- GTD
- Movies
- Music
- Privacy
- Profession
- Risk
- Security
- University and Studies
- Web Development
Monthly archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- December 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- February 2005
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
Search
Profile of a Fraudster
Just finished having a skim of the KPMG Profile of a Fraudster Survey for this year, which I found from the recent Risks Digest post. I have to admit that this survey interested me not only in the professional sense but also personally given my family history. Some of the more interesting statistics do not surpise me at all:
- 70 percent of fraudsters were between the ages of 36 and 55 years old.
- 85 percent of perpetrators were male.
- In 68 percent of profiles the perpetrator acted independently.
- Members of senior management (including board members) represent 60 percent of all fraudsters. An additional 26 percent of profiles involve management level persons bringing the total to 86 percent of profiles involving management. This result highlights a risk that every company faces: executives are entrusted with sensitive company information and yet are also often in a position to override internal controls.
- 91 percent of perpetrators did not stop at one single fraudulent transaction but rather performed multiple fraudulent transactions; every third perpetrator acted more than 50 times.
- Greed and opportunity (when taken together account for 73 percent of profiles) are indicated to be the overriding motivations for fraud.
- No prior suspicion existed in more than half of the profiles…
- Perpetrators were able to commit fraud by primarily exploiting weak internal controls, in 49 percent of profiles.
I guess the only additional information I would have liked to have seen from this report is more international information, such as from Australia and the US.
Posted by Christian
25 April 2007
Post A Comment