Dailies
- Beast or Buddha
- Caoine
- Echoica
- Jina Bolton
- Lifehacker
- Overclockers Australia
- RiskAnalys.is
- Rory.Blog
- Schneier on Security
- Security Catalyst Community
- Security Ripcord
- Securosis.com
- Slashdot
- Whirlpool
Photos
Categories
- Books
- Computers
- Family
- Forensics
- General
- GTD
- Movies
- Music
- Privacy
- Profession
- Risk
- Security
- University and Studies
- Web Development
Monthly archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- December 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- February 2005
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
Search
Disclosures Approaching White Noise
Whilst I’m fairly interested to see how “Compulsory Disclosure” may or may not make its way into the Australian Privacy Act, I’m wondering if it will also eventually lead to a state of constant white noise.
What I’m referring to is the constant stream of breaches that are posted by either the Attrition Data Loss feed, or the Educational Security Incident feed, or any other number of websites that post data breach or loss notifications, and how seeing a constant stream of these breaches really starts to make the impact seem less important.
It certainly gives you the feeling that the probability of your information being disclosed at some point is fairly likely so why don’t we just spray our credit card numbers on a wall?
Posted by Christian 
31 October 2007
Post A Comment